Objectionable Decision Act Proposal - Suggestion

So i may not be a codetalker (since im not Navajo or that old xD) buuut should we lock this until future updates or we just roll with it?

Keep it unlocked so ppl can post their opinions. Nothin wrong goin on

So is this being voted on in the senate or council?

OK so what guidelines should be established for this? What is unreasonable?

Considering that is very broad and can be argued either way I think it's a bad guideline. Perhaps it would be best to provide a specific code of conduct for Jedi and Sith as well as Diplomatic, Administrative, and Senatorial codes of conduct that must be followed. If that code of conduct is not violated then an action against them is unreasonable.

Btw, this idea is good to go for voting Aard. Green light now that the Sen Elec are over. so when you have the final version ready guys, give it up so it can go thru processing.

We'll need codes of conduct for each area: Admin, Senate, Diplomatics, Jedi, & Sith.

you mean put our hands around everybody's neck?

No, just guidelines. For instance, a Diploatic code of conduct would be: "Be polite and amiable to all non-clan members. Be accommodating, but do not overstep your bounds. Be available, but not obsessive. Be forgiving, but not compromising."

I'd have to make some serious revisions to make sure it worked, but you get the idea. If a player violates this and I take action against them, then I'm justified, if a player does not, then it is questionable and it can be challenged by the player.

i still think our base rules for our members cover this up.

But there may be other factors. It's not technically against the rules to initiate contact with a clan and then never speak to them again, but it's still bad Diplomatic protocol. Same a Sith that's not confident isn't against the rules, but it's also not the Sith way so a Dark Lord may want to deny entrance because of it.

annnd.... thats bad right? =o

Not bad, but it may be a reasonable reason for the DL to not want someone in their faction. Likewise someone who initiates contact but never follows up is not someone I would want acting in a Diplomatic capacity.

eh your siths, and its agame. you be the judge.

Well Clan Rules are too broad to me to use like this. I don't blame Sess for rejecting Cog mainly because Cog can be annoying at times. This isn't against the Clan Rules though.

i think, personally, that not excepting someone into your own faction because of personal reasons, like what deadly did, should be allowed. before you counter this with whatever, i know that it can hurt the person who was rejected's feelings and all, but you also need to take into account the person doing the rejecting. deadly himself stated that he had a problem with cog in that situation and thats why he did it.

a personal problem like that shouldnt have any rules against it because at this moment in time you can think of deadly as the boss of a company and cog as someone trying to join that the boss hates. if thats the case, mostlikly the worker wotn be hired because of the personal relationship between the two, wrong in the real world yes, in cyberspace, its all made up and a game.

as for interactions with other clans, yes, i think there should be certain rules for a diplomate to follow unless said clan desides to be an ass, then the diplomate should have full power to retaliate and kick them off the server. =o thats jsut my thinking though

and that's a lot of unessassary voting that has to be done over a small problem =o if a jedi is going sith or a sith is going jedi, they should realize that the moment they try to switch they step into the opposite factions rules and regulations. =o

The senate votings are all private in who votes what. these statements that you require from the senate are imcompatible with the determined charter and senatorial rules, and cannot be passed due to conflicts with the already established core law of the Charter.