Troll or No Troll?

Donald Trump running for President. Trolling or Serious?

I think he is serious but he will not be able to pull it off. All he will do is insure 4 more years of Obama.

Ensure* Insure indicates a guarantee by means of re-compensation.

serious and probably has a very good chance of winning

lets not forget an entire state voted Schwarzenegger
so trump with all his money & fanbase can accomplish it

and it will be just in time for the 2012 end of the world

Aardvark wrote:Ensure* Insure indicates a guarantee by means of re-compensation.

I sit corrected...

sit cause i am at work other wise i would stand...

GET BACK TO WORK, OLD GEEZER. FUCKIN LAZY BUM READIN FORUMS INSTEAD OF WORKIN.

anyway, your presidency is fucked anyway, might as well have a laugh while youre at it.

I say trolling/serious, half half if you will.

Well there you go

http://www.850koa.com/cc-common/news/sections/newsarticle.html?feed=104768&article=8487972

I would vote for trump over Obama I hate Obama never liked him even though today they released his ''birth certificate'' I doubt he was born here he has done nothing he said he was going to do except make a poor excuse for health insurance policy that makes it ok for people to be lazy not have a job be on welfare and still get health insurance...

P.S. Im not racist I have a color t.v.

haize wrote:P.S. Im not racist I have a color t.v.

lol rep ^

I elect my local 7-11 manager, he's more qualified than the current candidates.

Drist wrote:

haize wrote:P.S. Im not racist I have a color t.v.

lol rep ^

Very nice...

why does everyone hate on obama? the congress deserves more hating then him. they cant decide on shit

true, your president is not that bad in comparison to the idiocy that bi partisan congress and senate are.

also, your other choice was McCain......lesser of two evils, people, lesser of two evils....

I say Donald couldn't run a country since he has no real political experience. That's my .02 cents. But then again i've been proven wrong so xP.

Sqrl wrote:I say Donald couldn't run a country since he has no real political experience. That's my .02 cents. But then again i've been proven wrong so xP.

yES CAUSE, YOUR PRESIDENTS WHO DO HAVE POLITICAL EXPERIENCE END UP SO WELL.....

JFK and Ronald Regan were two of the best, and Ronald Regan was a movie star.... Im just worried about trump because he said we should just take the oil from iraq and other middle east countries....

which is stupid. damn republicans >.<

Dray The Fingerless wrote:

Sqrl wrote:I say Donald couldn't run a country since he has no real political experience. That's my .02 cents. But then again i've been proven wrong so xP.

yES CAUSE, YOUR PRESIDENTS WHO DO HAVE POLITICAL EXPERIENCE END UP SO WELL.....

Sry im not euro

Donald Trump had a casino that went bankrupt, you REALLY want him running a country's finances?

And Soran, don't think either party is in the right, they're all out for the biggest piece of the pie before the floor drops out from under them. You want a country that works? Ban political parties so that you don't have two "sides" you just have people honestly saying what they believe.

oh no i wasnt playing favoritism, i was just commenting on republicans acts on oil. personally i tihnk america's government needs a whole new makeover, but thats just me

MammalMan said:
Ban political parties so that you don't have two "sides" you just have people honestly saying what they believe.

Then we'd become a 1 party system otherwise known as a Dictatorship. Plus honestly the people don't really know what they want. Realistically speaking if the parties were to be banned or removed you would have chaos.

Granted that, the major parties make it so a minority party cannot win and the fact that no party is perfect nor is any country. Granted the people could probably do a better job at the moment but since they don't know what they want plus the fact there will always be an opposing side to one's argument regardless.

Sqrl wrote:

MammalMan said:
Ban political parties so that you don't have two "sides" you just have people honestly saying what they believe.

Then we'd become a 1 party system otherwise known as a Dictatorship. Plus honestly the people don't really know what they want. Realistically speaking if the parties were to be banned or removed you would have chaos.

Granted that, the major parties make it so a minority party cannot win and the fact that no party is perfect nor is any country. Granted the people could probably do a better job at the moment but since they don't know what they want plus the fact there will always be an opposing side to one's argument regardless.

Bipartisan state is VERY power centered. You have two elites who have the power, wich is a very small group. Eliminate the special rights of rallies you call parties and things get better. Sure, power is always in the elite, but you have to dampen it the best way you can. Then again, it all falls down to what the corporates with the money want, since they sponsor and advertise everything you see and know.

True, but that is my hypothesis on what would happen provided the two major parties would be banned/removed. I would like to get back into the donald trump thing if i could. What gets me is he pretty much attacked Obama with the he isn't legal to become president since he wasn't born in the U.S. (He was however.) Which leads me to believe... should the U.S. be run by a egotistical multi-billionare?