Prestige Class Test

cant. test. your. self. the educational system has a system to evaluate students too aard, doesnt mean they can go and evaluate themselves. I WILL EVALUATE YOU. ive figured out your system by now.

It's not the educational system, it's a fun test, and I can separate myself from my work, I've done it many times.

as.i.said.you.cant.test.your.self.

Aard:



you were very close to Watchman status, but ultimately you were less tactical and too frontal than a Watchmen would be in a battle.

As I said, I'll reveal later.

Watchman; Tendency to light, thoughtful answers, with a cross between simple and complex

Explanation (for any interested); While the actions indicate a cross between simple and complex, with an overwhelming presensce of a thinking method, the overall intent indicates someone who thinks beyond the battle at hand. Something a Sentinel does not do.

Necal wrote:Watchman; Tendency to light, thoughtful answers, with a cross between simple and complex

Explanation (for any interested); While the actions indicate a cross between simple and complex, with an overwhelming presensce of a thinking method, the overall intent indicates someone who thinks beyond the battle at hand. Something a Sentinel does not do.

i disagree. he jumps far too early to attack. a watchmen who watches beyond the battle knows that his attacks may change its course. the final question was the hardest one, becuz he indeed tries to see beyond the battle, but he does it in such an agressive manner, such untactful and unsmooth way for a watchmen.

Its not just the actions; its the intent.

hence why sentinel. a sentinel is a smart cunning person, but a watchmen is a smart cunning person who is VERY VERY cautious with evth he does.

His intent is clear; he tries to think beyond his actions. We can poke a dozen holes and point out even more ways, but the intent is to prevent future ramifications. It is lacking when he maims the first person, I agree, but the overwhelming trend is towards a 'look beyond' situation. Does it work? No. Is it what he's trying to do? Yes.

He is extremely aggressive in that last question, when he says he will tie them up and show them to their armies, i just saw him raising to a hill and holdin both general's heads in each hand for everyone to see. that is a extremely dangerous move to do, to capture their leader and taunt them with that, seeing as both armies can fuck you up right then.

Yes, because there would be absolutly no way for him to, say, take out his saber, put it right by one of the generals, and occasionally switch so that people will know he could kill either in a heartbeat.

Another thing; a Sentinel would not risk that. A Sentinel is security minded. A sentinel would run away and contact through a viewing screen or hologram with a threat to kill them; a Watchman would recognize the potential advantages of doing it in front, weigh the options, and probably come out with that being the better choice if he wishes to prevent Genocide.

lets kill him .....

Proper answer: None.

Those results fit none of the twelve options because each answer includes differing degrees of the three methods, although the two closest matches are Weapon Master and Watchman. The first answer shows thoughtfulness and thinking beyond the situation, accounting for what his involvement would mean. The willingness to join a side he's already supported is practicability, a sign or a Sentinel or Watchman. The desire to remain out of the fight unless a greater cause will be served is a sign of a Consular or Master. The second answer shows a confidence in abilities and a well trained eye, signs of a Guardian or Weapon Master. The security minded aspect of being willing to harm or kill the person if necessary, but preferring not to because of information are characteristics of a Sentinel or Watchman with a closer resemblance to Watchman for considering the possibility to escape and accounting for how dangerous they would be during a surprise attack. The third answer shows a keen eye to discern information from stances and a high degree of confidence in skill as well as an aggressive, but not violent solution, characteristic of a Weapon Master. The recognition that the only way to get through to genocidal people is to show them that they are not superior to anyone, and knowing that, even failing that, he may unite them in a hatred of the man that trussed up both their leaders is risky, and fits either a bold Watchman or a reserved Lord. The option to erase all presence of himself from the battlefield should he need to not get involved is characteristic of a Watchman or Master.

Interestingly enough, the reason why my answers are so odd is the fact that when Champ left for so long, without his strong charisma, I had to develop a more aggressive way of dealing with things that's beginning to stick to my personality.

Now cue hate replies

[hatereply]FUCK YOU MAN!!![/hatereply]


I thought Dray was right.