random ok sence ara dont like my thing in great hall here is OT lets get it lockedfast

Aardvark wrote:

Nihil wrote:What I know is that I presented my thoughts in a way that it is impossible to argue against, I didn't instigate anything Dray, at least I didn't try to, go read my posts and tell me that I was purposely trying to rile aard up.

Considering once I answered your question you proceeded to call me out and provoke an argument, yes you instigate things. In fact, I had a right to infract you for doing so, but I didn't because my comment was boardline enough to be pointed out as flame baiting. As clarified before, I said his actions over the issue were stupid, I also said he's normally a wise person, I wasn't insulting because that's saying something to provoke a reaction I was merely stating how I felt about his actions at that time.

Now you can continue this arguing about what I said if you wish, at which point I will infract myself for flame baiting and you for outright flaming then lock the thread. Or you can let it go, and we can move on. The ball's in your court now.

Ptolemy wrote:

Nihil wrote:

Dray The Fingerless wrote:nihil is just butthurt that i dont let myself get twirled in his loops like aard and ara do.

what loops?

What I know is that I presented my thoughts in a way that it is impossible to argue against, I didn't instigate anything Dray, at least I didn't try to, go read my posts and tell me that I was purposely trying to rile aard up.

You just refuse to listen to any logic but your own. Simple to win when no one else has a valid argument.

Nihil wrote:

Aardvark wrote:

Nihil wrote:What I know is that I presented my thoughts in a way that it is impossible to argue against, I didn't instigate anything Dray, at least I didn't try to, go read my posts and tell me that I was purposely trying to rile aard up.

Considering once I answered your question you proceeded to call me out and provoke an argument, yes you instigate things. In fact, I had a right to infract you for doing so, but I didn't because my comment was boardline enough to be pointed out as flame baiting. As clarified before, I said his actions over the issue were stupid, I also said he's normally a wise person, I wasn't insulting because that's saying something to provoke a reaction I was merely stating how I felt about his actions at that time.

Now you can continue this arguing about what I said if you wish, at which point I will infract myself for flame baiting and you for outright flaming then lock the thread. Or you can let it go, and we can move on. The ball's in your court now.

Actually, I just did what you did to Iron, I didn't call you stupid, I said you were BEING stupid. Also, I wasn't insulting because I was merely stating how I felt about your actions at that time.

Ptolemy wrote:

Nihil wrote:

Dray The Fingerless wrote:nihil is just butthurt that i dont let myself get twirled in his loops like aard and ara do.

what loops?

What I know is that I presented my thoughts in a way that it is impossible to argue against, I didn't instigate anything Dray, at least I didn't try to, go read my posts and tell me that I was purposely trying to rile aard up.

You just refuse to listen to any logic but your own. Simple to win when no one else has a valid argument.

Logic is one way, its either yes or no. Somethings are irrational, like an object growing smaller when it approaches the speed of light, but these things have been proved.

If you can show me an example of me rejecting someone else's logic, then that will be good for me.