Ban Appeals

True but since the current version of Japlus is pretty secure, it is essentially equal having a house with top security. Such as motion sensors, deadlock doors (bank vault type), etc and you have 19 children and a wife. Common sense would dictate it's someone out of those 20, and since we don't have any leet Chinese government hackers or any other government intelligence agency working against JvS. Security shouldn't be a main concern

Talkin'boutFreedom wrote:True but since the current version of Japlus is pretty secure, it is essentially equal having a house with top security. Such as motion sensors, deadlock doors (bank vault type), etc and you have 19 children and a wife. Common sense would dictate it's someone out of those 20, and since we don't have any leet Chinese government hackers or any other government intelligence agency working against JvS. Security shouldn't be a main concern

so when i have an 'unbreakable' security system i should let this guy i do not know eat my food and play with my kids?

anyone see whats wrong with that viewpoint?

No. He tells me who he is and why he should be there then he gets out on his own or he gets carried out.

Ptolemy wrote:

Talkin'boutFreedom wrote:True but since the current version of Japlus is pretty secure, it is essentially equal having a house with top security. Such as motion sensors, deadlock doors (bank vault type), etc and you have 19 children and a wife. Common sense would dictate it's someone out of those 20, and since we don't have any leet Chinese government hackers or any other government intelligence agency working against JvS. Security shouldn't be a main concern

so when i have an 'unbreakable' security system i should let this guy i do not know eat my food and play with my kids?

anyone see whats wrong with that viewpoint?

No. He tells me who he is and why he should be there then he gets out on his own or he gets carried out.

Hopefully if the system is unbreakable, common sense dictates that whoever is in the house, is either one of the 19 children or the wife. It is 'unbreakable'

Talkin'boutFreedom wrote:

Ptolemy wrote:

Talkin'boutFreedom wrote:True but since the current version of Japlus is pretty secure, it is essentially equal having a house with top security. Such as motion sensors, deadlock doors (bank vault type), etc and you have 19 children and a wife. Common sense would dictate it's someone out of those 20, and since we don't have any leet Chinese government hackers or any other government intelligence agency working against JvS. Security shouldn't be a main concern

so when i have an 'unbreakable' security system i should let this guy i do not know eat my food and play with my kids?

anyone see whats wrong with that viewpoint?

No. He tells me who he is and why he should be there then he gets out on his own or he gets carried out.

Hopefully if the system is unbreakable, common sense dictates that whoever is in the house, is either one of the 19 children or the wife. It is 'unbreakable'

There is no system that is unbreakable as evidenced by those that like to give out passwords. Thing is you do not know if there is someone there that you do not know not wearing tags how do you know who it is and what is SO difficult about saying ye hay it serv here??? Is it so terrible to expose your identity to a fellow admin? Seriously how hard is it?

open console

type /amsay I am serv

hit enter

holy crap! never mind i see your point that is SOOOOoo difficult, I apologize that i would even presume that anyone would know how to complete such a difficult process...

seriously...

You can say my process is so difficult but your process is the same, how hard is it to let someone who is doing nothing, letting them be? I like to be able to just play for 10 mins, coming and going without looking at any chat.

''holy crap! never mind i see your point that is SOOOOoo difficult, I apologize that i would even presume that anyone would know how to complete such a difficult process...''

you contenually m iss the point of the conversation...

According to you, admins should not have the authority to remove someone that should not be there...

am i right?

Sure they can but according to you privacy shouldn't exist then right?

You can be as private as you want.

BUT on private property you should be able to know who is there. this is not a public forum and that is not a public server.

We want to control who has access other wise we would not have a password to access it. What is the big deal of telling an adminwho you are so we know if you belong there?

You want to be anonymous fine but on private property be prepared for the consequences.

My mind is a bit blurry, mind reminding me when there was an intruder on the server besides Keiji and I think one other dude forgot his name? Also tell me what the threat level of an intruder is? Along with that since you are enforcing for JvS as a whole, wouldn't a clan member belonging to the clan also have a right to act as he pleases(without being a jackass) on CW?

heh...guys, u making big deal from nothing. This case was explained...so, just unban Serv and have fun in game:)

you still skirt the issue i have, we both have valid points i answered yours but you will not answer mine.

i am done

It is what it is.

Up to those with more say so than I.

Pto was in his right. The server is safe from hacking for the most part, but the people like to blab. It's stated in the rules that the clan war is a private and you must have authorization as a Friend, Ally, or Member to gain access. Serv, you provided nothing to the admin, so to be blunt this is like going to an airport and getting on a plane to England and getting upset when they ask for your passport.

Aardvark wrote:Pto was in his right. The server is safe from hacking for the most part, but the people like to blab. It's stated in the rules that the clan war is a private and you must have authorization as a Friend, Ally, or Member to gain access. Serv, you provided nothing to the admin, so to be blunt this is like going to an airport and getting on a plane to England and getting upset when they ask for your passport.

^^

I would like to be unbanned from CW

?.. i think it was supposed to be 2 days

LMAO I guess you will think twice before you break the rules

Yeah its espicially funny when you said '' Nigga was never the question '' and all u need to is look at SS's with the name 1 and see all i ever said was nigga.. rofl

Kurupt wrote:Yeah its espicially funny when you said '' Nigga was never the question '' and all u need to is look at SS's with the name 1 and see all i ever said was nigga.. rofl

hey man, you put your head on the chopping block, don't be surprised if you lose it.

Hey man i'm just saying the truth

Wait...you were banned? D:

yeah he was -cause he said some forbidden stuff.... .


Kur just wait for aard - hes gonna unban you.

Kurupt wrote:Hey man i'm just saying the truth

Perception is reality, your reality is not always the same as most peoples. If you do not realize what you were doing is wrong and spiteful, then you are bound to repeat the mistake.

do it once, wont happen again.

happens twice, the third is coming

Ofcourse i know what i said was wrong all i'm saying is you wrote Nigga wasn't the question as if it was '' ok '' maybe i misunderstood but, that was all i ever said.. I don't appreciate you trying to make it look like i said nigger